söndag 22 november 2015

second shitty draft.

Good evening!
I'm now posting my latest draft of my essay. Please keep in mind that it is not close to done yet and that it is, again, a very shitty draft. Enjoy!


As a girl, growing up in the Eastern Sierra, Holly Harris learned to love and appreciate the outdoors. Amongst open fields, tall mountains, and forever meandering rivers she found her passion––a passion for nature. Throughout her life this passion has been the trail of breadcrumbs––it stayed with her through various jobs, education, and volunteering. She explained to me that she didn’t really plan on becoming an environmental consultant, but she kind of grew into it and her career is something that is constantly evolving. Harris told me, during our conversation over a cup of coffee, that she studied environmental science in college and that much of the interest derived from that. The love for nature grew into a feeling of obligation to make a difference in this world, but as many others, she didn’t know how to go about it “I have to try my little heart out at everything in life.”she said with determination and compassion in her voice. Harris started out her journey towards change with working for the forest service doing work habitat surveys and restoration ecology. Working for the Forest Service led her on the path of working for the local government, covering legal issues and stopping development from harming precious eco-systems. She finally found her heart at Rincon Consultants, where she feels she can keep her early promise to  herself to make a difference in this world. Harris holds firm that in order to make a difference it is important to be kind to yourself and others––it is about helping not preventing, it’s about guiding not opposing. She adds, that to make an impact she has to try to understand and appreciate the audience’s side. Knowing and understanding the audience has become the most important part in Harris’s goal to influence positive change in her field as an environmental consultant and writing is the tool she uses to get there.  
All of the writing that Harris does serves a specific purpose and it has to speak to her readers. Understanding the purpose of the writing itself and who the reader is can change the outcome of the projects she is trying to implement. This is something every writer has to consider before writing, along with personal voice. In How to Read Like a Writer, Mike Bunn, talks about the importance of reading like a writer. In order to do that, you need to understand the purpose of the writing and who it was intended to reach and touch. It is a relationship between the reader and the writer, they have to have a conversation through the shared interest, i.e. the writing sample. To have a productive and engaging conversation the reader and the writer have to have a mutual understanding, a common ground to stand on. Harris explains that most of the time, less is more, “people generally add a lot of words when they write, words that don’t need to be there. I know because I used to do that too, just to sound smart, but it has to be at a level at which my audience can understand and it has to be straight to the point.” When talking to Harris I also got the impression that making it easier for the reader to understand and connect to the writing is very important, the reader’s interest is easily lost (forever). In order to do just that (make it easy for the reader) Harris uses certain moves as a writer, “people need to be able to read it and understand what is happening at once, so you will want to constantly summarize and make things into bullet points. Having information being organized, clear, and concise is golden when you try to win people over.”  Even though Mike Bunn writes about the fact that you as a reader have to understand the intentions of the writer, this goes both ways, as a writer you have to understand your reader. Bunn explains this in a compelling way, “What is it about the way this text is written that makes you respond the way you do?” (pg. 72). He poses an interesting question, you as a writer have to understand what make people tick––what can compel them to read this and then take action? It is an active writing decision, the decision to compel people––to “hook” the reader. The next step after examining what make people tick, is to as Bunn puts it, “...[understand] what effect these different choices would have on readers” (pg.72). Considering the effect helps the writer to make effective choices and what role those choices play in inspiring change. In the conversation I had with Harris she mentioned how important writerly choices and moves are, she explained how small things can play a huge role in the bigger picture. Harris brought up an example when a single word played a big role in her life, “I got a Latin name wrong on a plant in a rare plant report that I submitted for a project, the whole thing might get sued based on that. Wording and formatting is a big deal in my field of work.” Even though it may seem like a small mistake, that mistake can possibly affect the outcome of the project that Harris worked hard to implement and consequently affect the environment we live in. Words do matter in every little and big way. To be able to write directly to your reader you need to have an understanding for what they like and what they are looking for in a writing sample. Harris herself knows the importance of this, so much so, that she keeps report outlines that matches what her bosses are looking for, yes, she keeps one for every boss. This, she explains, is one of the ways to make sure that your voice gets heard. The words she writes would easily get discarded if they weren’t written in the way the audience wants to read them. I think that that is something that we all face on a daily basis, the things we read have to appeal to us, just as much as products we buy. Taste is crucial to consider when writing for a specific demographic. We all know what we like, without considering for what reason we like the things we like. It is therefore up to the writer to understand what the audience like, just like it is up to the marketer to understand why we buy the things we buy. And just like the marketer knows that the understanding of the consumer makes the difference in the decision of a purchase, the writer faces the same considerations and has to apply his or her words to readers preferences in order to get them to read it. Harris’s readers like open white space in a text, they like to combine their reading with pictures to faster understand all the concepts, they also like to see the main points made into bullet points. (transitioning here)
  When Harris came walking in the coffee shop at seven pm that night, she looked tired, just as tired as anyone would look after trying to save the world all day. When she spoke, she spoke with exhaustion, but somewhere in there, there was a light of hope and determination. Saving the world or trying to make a difference is no easy job and it includes a lot of responsibility. Harris is responsible for both sides of a never-ending conversation. She tries to protect the underdog--the guys that most people don’t care about but are so important to the eco-systems we live in--animals. plants, trees, you name it! Harris does everything in her power to save them from being demolished by apartment complexes, parking lots, and shopping malls. But not only does she protect the underdog, she tries to make the developers happy, because as she said before it is not about preventing or opposing, it is about guiding--we all have to live and thrive together, but we need each other to do that. (transitioning here)

To write effectively as an environmental consultant is a highly complex thing, because, really, it’s about knowing your reader––it is about understanding a personality.  (reinstate the thesis here)

söndag 15 november 2015

My Super Duper Shitty Draft!

So here is my really, I mean really SHITTY draft!!!

As a girl, growing up in the Eastern Sierra, Holly Harris learned to love and appreciate the outdoors. Amongst open fields, tall mountains, and forever meandering rivers she found her passion––a passion for nature (something more describing here). Throughout her life this passion has been the trail of breadcrumbs––even through waitressing , school, and volunteering the passion for nature (lingered) in the back of her mind. She explained to me that she didn’t really plan on becoming an environmental consultant, but she kind of grew into it and her career is something that is constantly evolving, (very much like writing??). Harris always knew that she wanted to make a difference in the world and work with something interesting , but exactly what that was going to be she wasn’t sure of , so, she worked for the forest service doing work habitat surveys and restoration ecology, that led her on the path towards working for the local government, covering legal issues and stopping development from harming precious eco-systems, and finally she found her heart at Rincon Consultants, where she feels she can hold herself to her early promise to make a difference in this world. Harris holds firm that in order to make a difference it is important to be kind to yourself and others––it is about helping not preventing, it’s about guiding not confronting. She also adds, that to make an impact she has to try to understand and appreciate the audience’s side(..). Writing has become a tool for Harris to implement positive change in her environment.
   
            (Knowing and understanding the audience’s voice, in order to implement change, is the
most important aspect in the field of environmental consulting.)
Most of the writing that Harris does serves a specific purpose and it has to speak to her readers. Understanding the purpose of the writing itself and who the reader is can change the outcome of the projects she is trying to implement. This is something every writer has to consider before writing, along with personal voice. In How to Read Like a Writer, Mike Bunn, talks about the importance of reading like a writer. In order to do that, you need to understand the purpose of the writing and who it was intended to reach and touch. It is a relationship between the reader and the writer, they have to have a conversation through the shared interest, i.e. the writing sample. To have a productive and engaging conversation the reader and the writer have to have a mutual understanding, a common ground to stand on. Harris explains that most of the time, less is more, “people generally add a lot of words when they write, words that don’t need to be there. I know because I used to do that too, just to sound smart, but it has to be at a level at which my audience can understand and it has to be straight to the point.” When talking to Harris I also got the impression that making it easier for the reader to understand and connect to the writing is very important, the reader’s interest is easily lost (forever). In order to do just that (make it easy for the reader) Harris uses certain moves as a writer, “people need to be able to read it and understand what is happening at once, so you will want to constantly summarize and make things into bullet points. Having information being organized, clear, and concise is golden when you try to win people over.”   
  


måndag 9 november 2015

Thesis statements

Thesis statements

  • ·      The most important component of a piece of writing is targeting it to a specific audience.
  • ·      In writing, the most important component is to put yourself in your reader’s shoes and write like your reader.
  • ·      To get your point across in a piece of writing you have to combine your particular writing moves with the reading moves of the audience.  

lördag 7 november 2015

Thesis statements and arguments!

Top of the morning to ya! 
Again hope you're having a great weekend. 

When I read this weeks readings I was quite distracted––I am still a little confused about our final project. But I think that it will all be clear in the end. The readings for this week were very helpful since we ourselves need to write thesis statements and arguments. 

The first text––So What? Who Cares? Was about defining who you're writing for and how are you applying it to the real world or the bigger picture. It is important to adress specific people or groups to answer the question who cares? It is about not losing the readers interest. A good way to adress this is to combine what others say about the matter and what you're trying to say about it. Just providing a thesis statement isn't enough, how will your particular audience know that it is directed to them? You also have to link argument to a larger matter––the bigger picture. Linking it to the real world will explain to the reader why it is important to them, how it affects their lives, and why they should listen.

The comic for this week was about  how to write good arguments to match your claim. Arguments are largely like conversations, they have a format an outline that should be followed. An argument should explain more than one side of the opinion. It should define what we're talking about and also, again, link it to the bigger picture. In order to do so it's important to think about what's at stake? There are some tricks to how to write a good argument, namely recognizing these questions––what, how, who, and why? By using what you get the facts across, how brings up the circumstances, who reflects the relationships, and why represents the reasons. Evidence is extremely important when it comes to writing good arguments. Evidence can be presented by comparison or by experts informed opinions. The claim (thesis statement) and the evidence need to have a firm connection in order to be viewed as credible. It is easy to make up that connection, but it will not withstand in a debate. Make sure that you can backup your claim/thesis statement. 

Have a nice weekend! Enjoy the sun! 
// Isa Out

söndag 1 november 2015

Conducting a great Interview!

Good afternoon my peoples!

Hope you all had great Halloween weekend and that you're not too hungover today. I spent my Halloween with my good friends and I had a great time!

I started out reading about how to do research in this weeks readings. When doing research it is important to know how to do it correctly in order to get the best results. Firsthand research is a good way to get the best outcome. Firsthand research includes observations, interviews, and surveys. When observing you can either participate and interact with the people you observe or you can conduct an unobtrusive observation method, which means that you do not interact––you simply observe and take notes. When observing it is important to not be bias. If you think you know the answer there is no point of doing the research and the chance is that it will be bias.

Another way to get firsthand research is through interviews. I chose to be extra attentive to this part of the reading since we are conducting interviews in the near future. Before an interview is conducted it is important to have the right questions. Writing good questions is difficult, as I think we all know by now. Here are some tips from the reading on writing good questions:

  • narrow your topic down, be specific in your questions!
  • don't make assumptions.
  • ask about one thing at a time. 
  • avoid leading questions. 
  • make the interviewee elaborate on certain questions 
  • avoid closed-ended questions.
Face to face interviews are preferred as they give you the chance to ask follow up questions. Also you get more information that way––you can observe. It is important to find a suitable location for your interview––preferably a quiet and calm place where it is easy to focus. In addition it is good to record your interview so no information gets lost. This is also a good way to make sure that you're not being bias in your report. Lastly you have to transcribe your interview, meaning that you have to write out what you recorded.

I found the second reading very interesting as I have never thought about reading in the way the author describes it. When I was reading the text I had the TV on. I like background noise when I study, don't ask me why but it helps. However when reading I have found it difficult to focus if I have disruptive elements around me. Reading with disruptiveness around you makes you focus on every word and every sentence. This is a way to get an understanding for the technique, word choices, format, and the way the author wants you to perceive the material. We have done this exact thing in class, when we did the analysis of the artifacts. We focused less on the message and more on the elements of the artifacts. Reading like this is a good way to decide what you like about the reading and what you don't like––would you use this technique in your own writing? It is like being a reading detective––you have to find out the underlying motives behind the authors choices. Read like a writer, or put in another context you should read like a carpenter would assess a project or how an architect looks at a building.

To the last part of this weeks assignment my interview questions:
  • ·      How did you decide what you wanted to work with?
  • ·      What were your motivations to get into it?
  • ·      What is the most rewarding aspect of your work?
  • ·      How do you stay relevant on the latest trends in your industry?
  • ·      How often do you implement what you read about in your work?
  • ·      What is the purpose of these writings?
  • ·      What else do you use to supplement the academic readings you read to stay ahead?
  • ·      How often do you cite or reference your academic readings to get a point across in your line of work?
  • ·      What kind of prior knowledge do you need to have to read/understand these writings (if any)?
  • ·      Did your education prepare you for reading these kinds of writings?
  • ·      How much do you read (professionally) a week?
  • ·      What would you call the genre of these writings?